Further readingGuides
AI in hotels in 2026: what European hoteliers actually use

One click, and Google will show my articles more often in your results.
Every hospitality technology vendor has been telling the same story for a couple of years: artificial intelligence is everywhere, and whoever isn't using it is falling behind. It's the kind of line that sells well and holds up poorly under scrutiny. The first independent study to ask a meaningful number of European hoteliers what they actually do, not what they fear they should be doing, tells a more useful story: neither a revolution nor irrelevance, but selective adoption concentrated on a handful of concrete uses.
A study, not a survey run by a software vendor
Between January and April 2025, the Institute of Tourism at HES-SO Valais-Wallis (Switzerland), led by Professor Roland Schegg and funded by the Swiss innovation agency Innosuisse, collected responses from 1,485 hotels across six European countries: Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Italy and Switzerland. The survey reached hotels through their respective national hotel associations (source: Institute of Tourism, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Artificial Intelligence in European Hotels: Adoption, Applications, and Barriers, June 2025; summary on Hospitality Net, authored by Schegg himself, published 9 July 2025, accessed 31 August 2026).
It's worth saying this before the numbers, not after: this is a voluntary sample, not a random draw. It's answered by whoever receives their association's newsletter and decides to spend a few minutes on it, and the country mix isn't balanced: Greece alone accounts for 31% of all responses, and the study itself flags this imbalance as a possible source of distortion in the aggregate figures. The numbers below therefore describe the hotels that answered this survey in these six countries in spring 2025, not "the European hotel industry" as a whole. With that stated limit, it remains the most solid data available today on this topic.
The real picture: 41, 43, 16
| Share | |
|---|---|
| Already uses AI tools | 41% |
| Doesn't use them | 43% |
| Will introduce them soon | 16% |
This isn't a snapshot of an industry split into those who've figured it out and those left behind. It's a sizeable group that has started, a larger one that hasn't yet, and a third that's moving now. For a property that hasn't touched any of this, the honest reading is that it's neither first nor last in the class: it sits alongside close to half of the properties that answered this survey.
What "using AI" actually means: three things, not twenty
Among the hotels that have already adopted it (the 41% above), the study also asks what they actually use. Three applications stand out clearly from the rest.
| Application | Share among AI adopters |
|---|---|
| Text generation (ChatGPT-type tools) | 74% |
| Online review analysis | 44% |
| Real-time dynamic pricing | 42% |
Text generation. This is the tool used to write a room description, a reply to a review, or a social post faster: it doesn't replace whoever decides what to say, it shortens the time it takes to say it. That's likely why this figure is the highest of the three: it doesn't require a contract with a specialised vendor, and it can be used from a website anyone can open in a minute.
Review analysis. With hundreds of reviews accumulated over the years, working out where to focus, whether check-in keeps coming up as a weak point, or breakfast does, becomes a job nobody does by hand one comment at a time anymore. The tool doesn't decide what to change here: it puts what to look at first in order.
Dynamic pricing. This is the feature that adjusts room rates based on demand without someone recalculating them every day. It isn't new to generative AI: automated revenue management has existed for years and is often already inside the property management software a property pays for anyway to meet local reporting and invoicing obligations. Before looking at a new product to do the same thing, it's worth checking whether that feature is already part of the subscription you have.
What stays marginal, and why that's fine
Website chatbots, in-property robotics, facial recognition at check-in: these are the applications that get the most headlines, and in the study they remain the least common even among hotels that already use AI. That's not a sign they "don't work": they make sense when a high volume of repetitive requests justifies the time it takes to set them up and keep them updated, a condition that mostly applies to chains and larger properties. For an independent property that isn't in that situation, not prioritising them isn't a gap to close: it's simply not being the case those tools are built for, today.
Why the 43% still don't use it
The two most cited reasons among hotels that haven't adopted anything aren't a verdict on how useful the tools are:
- 39% say they don't know enough about the solutions available;
- 35% cite setup cost as a barrier.
The two hold together, and partly solve each other. The text-generation figure (74% among adopters, and the cheapest to try since it's often free or already bundled into widely used tools) suggests that the part of "AI" most within reach for a small property isn't the one with the highest price tag: it's the one dedicated-system vendors advertise the least, because it doesn't earn them a subscription fee.
Where to start, without redoing anything
Three steps, in this order, before signing up for anything new.
Check what you already have. Ask your property management software provider whether it includes dynamic revenue management or text-generation tools: it's common to already pay for a feature without knowing it, because it arrived in an update without the product changing its name.
Find the repetitive work that costs you the most. Not "where could I put AI", but "what do I do every week that's always the same task": answering the same questions, writing similar descriptions, rereading the same reviews. That's where a tool saves real time, not generic "efficiency".
Don't chase what makes headlines. Robotics and facial recognition remain marginal even among hotels that have already adopted AI: if you don't have the volume that justifies them, they aren't the first thing to look at, whatever the article of the moment says.
The picture that emerges from this study isn't the alarm or the promise that usually comes with this topic: it's an industry adopting, selectively, the tools that save time on repetitive tasks, and for now leaving aside the ones that require a bigger investment for a less immediate return. If you're deciding where to start, that selectiveness isn't a limitation: it's the shortcut others have already found for you.
If you want to find out whether your property management software already has these features, or whether the process you'd like to automate isn't covered by any standard product, the digital check-up is free if you then go ahead with one of the monthly services. Otherwise write to me: describe what you do by hand every week, and I'll tell you whether a tool for that already exists or whether it's a different kind of case.